Share this
MIL-S-901: Everything You Need to Know
by Brett Daniel on Jul 2, 2020 8:53:44 AM
Photo: Trenton Systems’ rugged servers and workstations can pass, and have passed, MIL-S-901 requirements, including heavyweight barge testing requirements. Contact us today to learn more.
Important Update: The information in this blog post is outdated, as MIL-S-901 has been superseded by MIL-DTL-901E. This blog post will remain live for future reference, however.
Note: Trenton Systems is not a compliance testing facility. We manufacture rugged servers and workstations that conform to military and industrial standards, such as MIL-STD-810 and DO-160, and we can ensure that our systems comply with these standards using our in-house testing equipment, or by sending our systems to a third-party compliance testing laboratory for validation, but our facility does not offer compliance testing services for products manufactured outside of Trenton Systems. For a list of laboratories that can assist you with your testing needs, please read this blog post, which lists the best compliance testing laboratories in the world.
Interested in learning about shipboard vibration testing or MIL-STD-810 shock testing? Check out MIL-STD-167-1: Everything You Need to Know and our MIL-STD-810 Shock Testing Overview.
Non sibi sed patriae.
Not for self, but for country.
This phrase is often cited as the unofficial motto of the United States Navy. It imparts a sense of selflessness and nationality among its members, simultaneously reminding them why and whom they serve.
To serve effectively, members of the Navy must be resilient, but so, too, must the tools and equipment they use to get the job done.
MIL-S-901 is one way the U.S. Department of Defense ensures that the Navy has reliable, resilient equipment on the water, during times of both peace and war.
It may be required for certain Navy contracts where servers must continue to function and perform as a result of high-impact shock. A failed mission could put troops in harm's way or even result in death.
- Gary Ziadeh, compliance coordinator at Trenton Systems
From rugged computers to switchboards to power supplies and numerous other shipboard installations, a MIL-S-901 shock testing certification provides a high degree of confidence that the equipment used by Navy sailors, captains, officers and commanders won’t fail them when they need it most.
Graphic: MIL-S-901 is a specification outlining a series of mechanical shock testing requirements for shipboard equipment owned and operated by the U.S. Navy.
What is MIL-S-901?
MIL-S-901, currently MIL-S-901D, is a military specification published by the DoD for the purpose of outlining shock testing requirements for Navy shipboard machinery, equipment, systems and structures. It is a commonly requested testing requirement for shipboard rugged servers, rugged workstations and other shipboard systems and equipment owned and operated by the U.S. Navy.
The latest revision of MIL-S-901, MIL-S-901D, was published March 17, 1989, superseding MIL-S-901C, which was published January 15, 1963. The specification’s official title is Shock Tests. H.I. (High-Impact) Shipboard Machinery, Equipment and Systems, Requirements For.
According to the specification, the listed shock testing requirements are necessary for any shipboard systems and equipment that are expected to withstand high-impact mechanical shocks inflicted by weaponry.
The purpose of these requirements is to verify the ability of shipboard installations to withstand shock loadings which may be incurred during wartime service due to the effects of nuclear or conventional weapons.
- Excerpt from MIL-S-901D
MIL-S-901 lists three test categories: lightweight, medium weight and heavyweight - two shock grades: Grade A and Grade B - three equipment classes: Class I, Class II and Class III - three shock test types: Type A, Type B and Type C - as well as several potential shipboard mounting locations.
In this blog post, we’ll begin by discussing the three tests associated with MIL-S-901.
MIL-S-901 lightweight test
The MIL-S-901 lightweight test makes use of a lightweight shock machine and anvil plate. According to the specification, the weight supported by the anvil plate shouldn’t exceed 550 pounds for this test.
Test items in their operational state are attached to the anvil plate of the shock machine using standard mounting fixtures. They are then subjected to three top, back and side hammer blows at hammer heights 1, 3 and 5 – applied parallel to each perpendicular axis.
In total, test items are subjected to nine blows during the MIL-S-901 lightweight test. Operational and post-test damage and functionality are notated, and any necessary changes to the system, if any, are made until the system is able to pass the test.
Test Schedule for Medium Weight Shock Machine
Table: The MIL-S-901 test schedule for medium weight equipment, specifying number of blows, equipment weight and hammer drop height
MIL-S-901 medium weight test
For the MIL-S-901 medium weight test, the weight supported by the medium weight shock machine’s anvil plate shouldn’t exceed 7,400 pounds, according to the specification.
Test items in their operational state are mounted and subjected to a minimum of six hammer blows, segmented into two rounds of three blows each.
The first round of blows is conducted with the test items mounted in their normal attitudes to simulate vertical shipboard shocks, while the second round is conducted with the items mounted in the inclined position to simulate athwartship shocks.
Operational and post-test damage and functionality are notated, and any necessary changes to the system, if any, are made until the system is able to pass the test.
MIL-S-901 Heavyweight Barge Testing
Video: An example of MIL-S-901D heavyweight barge testing. Credit: Aero Nav Labs
MIL-S-901 heavyweight test
The MIL-S-901 heavyweight test, also known as the barge test, is perhaps the most well-known test in MIL-S-901, mainly because it involves setting off explosive charges near a standard or large floating shock platform (FSP) that houses the item or equipment being tested.
That’s right. The final test in MIL-S-901 involves detonating explosives in water.
Pretty cool, right? We think so, too.
Test Schedule for Heavyweight Shock Testing
Table: The MIL-S-901 test schedule for heavyweight shock testing, specifying the test conditions, explosive charge depth and weight, shot direction and standoff distance based on the type of floating platform used during testing.
The MIL-S-901 heavyweight test consists of four shots in total. Additional shots may be required, depending on the specifications or contractor’s preference.
According to the MIL-S-901 heavyweight test schedule, a 60-pound explosive charge is detonated at a depth of 24 feet below the water’s surface for the standard FSP test, while a 300-lb charge is detonated at 20 feet below the water's surface for the large FSP test.
MIL-S-901 states that the explosive charges used during barge testing are located anywhere from 20-110 feet from the near side of the floating shock platform (FSP) and detonated in both the fore-and-aft and athwartship directions.
Trenton Systems’ rugged servers and workstations can pass, and have passed, MIL-S-901 requirements, including heavyweight barge testing requirements.
Our engineers design our processor boards and chassis from the ground up to withstand the most harsh shock and vibe tests, including MIL-S-901D.
- Michael Bowling, CEO of Trenton Systems
Contact us today to learn more about the compliance testing standards we support.
MIL-S-901 shock grades: Grade A v. Grade B
MIL-S-901 splits test items and equipment into two categories: Grade A and Grade B.
Although they’re referred to as shock grades in the specification, the categories don’t include or specify shock pulse measurements. They’re more so used to determine the essentiality of the equipment as it relates to a ship’s operation.
Grade A items are items which are essential to the safety and continued combat capability of the ship. Grade B items are items whose operation is not essential to the safety and combat capability of the ship but which could become a hazard to personnel, to grade A items or to the ship as a whole as a result of exposure to shock.
- Excerpt from MIL-S-901D
In short, the shock grades listed in MIL-S-901 help test engineers determine their level of operational importance.
MIL-S-901 equipment classes: Class I vs. Class II vs. Class III
MIL-S-901 goes even further with its classification of equipment and test items by splitting them into three classes as well.
- Class I equipment - required meet shock requirements without the use of resilient mountings installed between the equipment and the ship structure or shipboard foundation.
- Class II equipment - required to meet shock requirements with the use of resilient mountings installed between the equipment and the ship structure or shipboard foundation.
- Class III equipment - a hybrid category of the first two classes. Class III equipment has a shipboard application both with and without the use of resilient mountings and is required to meet both Class I and Class II requirements.
In short, each of these classes addresses a different mounting application, helping test engineers tailor their assessments based on the eventual location of the shipboard items and equipment being tested.
MIL-S-901 shock test types: Type A vs. Type B vs. Type C
Did you think we were finished with MIL-S-901 classifications? Think again!
MIL-S-901 divides its test types into three categories as well: Type A, Type B and Type C.
The Type A test, which the specification refers to as the preferred shock test, assesses a principal unit. MIL-S-901 defines principal units as those that are directly supported by the ship’s structure or by a foundation directly attached to it, as well as any items mounted in piping systems, ducting systems and similar systems. These items typically include diesel-generator sets, air conditioning plants, switchboards, radio transmitters, steam generators, missile launchers and valves.
The Type B test assesses the subsidiary components that comprise a principal unit. Examples include the diesel engine of a diesel-generator set, the electric motor of an air conditioning unit or the power supply section of a radio transmitter.
The Type C test assesses the subassemblies that comprise a principal unit or subsidiary component. Examples include thermometers, gauges, meters, relays and resistors.
Photo: Trenton Systems USA-made rugged servers and workstations are currently powering Navy programs and applications today. Our compliance department and test engineers are perfectly capable of meeting your military testing requirements, including those outlined in MIL-S-901D.
MIL-S-901 testing at Trenton Systems
Trenton Systems can certify its rugged servers and workstations to MIL-S-901 specifications. In fact, our MIL-S-901D-certified rugged computers are powering Navy programs and applications today.
Our military depends on made-in-USA tech that is designed for harsh testing such as MIL-S-901D.
- Michael Bowling, CEO of Trenton Systems
Our powerful TMS4711 PICMG systems, two of which are certified to MIL-S-901D barge testing standards, currently power the jet launch command system aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78).
These systems were the perfect choice for the Navy, which not only required barge testing certifications but the ability to expand their systems with high-speed, PCIe-based components.
Trenton Systems is more than happy to work with our customers on meeting their compliance testing needs. Visit our Testing Standards web page for more compliance testing information, and don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions.
Share this
- High-performance computers (42)
- Military computers (38)
- Rugged computers (32)
- Cybersecurity (25)
- Industrial computers (25)
- Military servers (24)
- MIL-SPEC (20)
- Rugged servers (19)
- Press Release (17)
- Industrial servers (16)
- MIL-STD-810 (16)
- 5G Technology (14)
- Intel (13)
- Rack mount servers (12)
- processing (12)
- Computer hardware (11)
- Edge computing (11)
- Rugged workstations (11)
- Made in USA (10)
- Partnerships (9)
- Rugged computing (9)
- Sales, Marketing, and Business Development (9)
- Trenton Systems (9)
- networking (9)
- Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) (7)
- Encryption (6)
- Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) (6)
- GPUs (6)
- IPU (6)
- Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) (6)
- Server motherboards (6)
- artificial intelligence (6)
- Computer stress tests (5)
- Cross domain solutions (5)
- Mission-critical servers (5)
- Rugged mini PCs (5)
- AI (4)
- BIOS (4)
- CPU (4)
- Defense (4)
- Military primes (4)
- Mission-critical systems (4)
- Platform Firmware Resilience (PFR) (4)
- Rugged blade servers (4)
- containerization (4)
- data protection (4)
- virtualization (4)
- Counterfeit electronic parts (3)
- DO-160 (3)
- Edge servers (3)
- Firmware (3)
- HPC (3)
- Just a Bunch of Disks (JBOD) (3)
- Leadership (3)
- Navy (3)
- O-RAN (3)
- RAID (3)
- RAM (3)
- Revision control (3)
- Ruggedization (3)
- SATCOM (3)
- Storage servers (3)
- Supply chain (3)
- Tactical Advanced Computer (TAC) (3)
- Wide-temp computers (3)
- computers made in the USA (3)
- data transfer (3)
- deep learning (3)
- embedded computers (3)
- embedded systems (3)
- firmware security (3)
- machine learning (3)
- Automatic test equipment (ATE) (2)
- C6ISR (2)
- COTS (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Compliance (2)
- Compute Express Link (CXL) (2)
- Computer networking (2)
- Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) (2)
- DDR (2)
- DDR4 (2)
- DPU (2)
- Dual CPU motherboards (2)
- EW (2)
- I/O (2)
- Military standards (2)
- NVIDIA (2)
- NVMe SSDs (2)
- PCIe (2)
- PCIe 4.0 (2)
- PCIe 5.0 (2)
- RAN (2)
- SIGINT (2)
- SWaP-C (2)
- Software Guard Extensions (SGX) (2)
- Submarines (2)
- Supply chain security (2)
- TAA compliance (2)
- airborne (2)
- as9100d (2)
- chassis (2)
- data diode (2)
- end-to-end solution (2)
- hardware security (2)
- hardware virtualization (2)
- integrated combat system (2)
- manufacturing reps (2)
- memory (2)
- mission computers (2)
- private 5G (2)
- protection (2)
- secure by design (2)
- small form factor (2)
- software security (2)
- vRAN (2)
- zero trust (2)
- zero trust architecture (2)
- 3U BAM Server (1)
- 4G (1)
- 4U (1)
- 5G Frequencies (1)
- 5G Frequency Bands (1)
- AI/ML/DL (1)
- Access CDS (1)
- Aegis Combat System (1)
- Armed Forces (1)
- Asymmetric encryption (1)
- C-RAN (1)
- COMINT (1)
- CPUs (1)
- Cloud-based CDS (1)
- Coast Guard (1)
- Compliance testing (1)
- Computer life cycle (1)
- Containers (1)
- D-RAN (1)
- DART (1)
- DDR5 (1)
- DMEA (1)
- Data Center Modular Hardware System (DC-MHS) (1)
- Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) (1)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects (DARP) (1)
- ELINT (1)
- EMI (1)
- EO/IR (1)
- Electromagnetic Interference (1)
- Electronic Warfare (EW) (1)
- FIPS 140-2 (1)
- FIPS 140-3 (1)
- Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) (1)
- Ground Control Stations (GCS) (1)
- Hardware-based CDS (1)
- Hybrid CDS (1)
- IES.5G (1)
- ION Mini PC (1)
- IP Ratings (1)
- IPMI (1)
- Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) (1)
- Industry news (1)
- Integrated Base Defense (IBD) (1)
- LAN ports (1)
- LTE (1)
- Life cycle management (1)
- Lockheed Martin (1)
- MIL-S-901 (1)
- MIL-STD-167-1 (1)
- MIL-STD-461 (1)
- MIL-STD-464 (1)
- MOSA (1)
- Multi-Access Edge Computing (1)
- NASA (1)
- NIC (1)
- NIC Card (1)
- NVMe (1)
- O-RAN compliant (1)
- Oil and Gas (1)
- Open Compute Project (OCP) (1)
- OpenRAN (1)
- P4 (1)
- PCIe card (1)
- PCIe lane (1)
- PCIe slot (1)
- Precision timestamping (1)
- Product life cycle (1)
- ROM (1)
- Raytheon (1)
- Remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) (1)
- Rugged computing glossary (1)
- SEDs (1)
- SIM Card (1)
- Secure boot (1)
- Sensor Open Systems Architecture (SOSA) (1)
- Small form-factor pluggable (SFP) (1)
- Smart Edge (1)
- Smart NIC (1)
- SmartNIC (1)
- Software-based CDS (1)
- Symmetric encryption (1)
- System hardening (1)
- System hardening best practices (1)
- TME (1)
- Tech Partners (1)
- Total Memory Encryption (TME) (1)
- Transfer CDS (1)
- USB ports (1)
- VMEbus International Trade Association (VITA) (1)
- Vertical Lift Consortium (VLC) (1)
- Virtual machines (1)
- What are embedded systems? (1)
- Wired access backhaul (1)
- Wireless access backhaul (1)
- accredidation (1)
- aerospace (1)
- air gaps (1)
- airborne computers (1)
- asteroid (1)
- authentication (1)
- autonomous (1)
- certification (1)
- cognitive software-defined radios (CDRS) (1)
- command and control (C2) (1)
- communications (1)
- cores (1)
- custom (1)
- customer service (1)
- customer support (1)
- data linking (1)
- data recording (1)
- ethernet (1)
- full disk encryption (1)
- hardware monitoring (1)
- heat sink (1)
- hypervisor (1)
- in-house technical support (1)
- input (1)
- integrated edge solution (1)
- international business (1)
- licensed spectrum (1)
- liquid cooling (1)
- mCOTS (1)
- microelectronics (1)
- missile defense (1)
- mixed criticality (1)
- moving (1)
- multi-factor authentication (1)
- network slicing (1)
- neural networks (1)
- new headquarters (1)
- next generation interceptor (1)
- non-volatile memory (1)
- operating system (1)
- output (1)
- outsourced technical support (1)
- post-boot (1)
- pre-boot (1)
- private networks (1)
- public networks (1)
- radio access network (RAN) (1)
- reconnaissance (1)
- secure flash (1)
- security (1)
- self-encrypting drives (SEDs) (1)
- sff (1)
- software (1)
- software-defined radios (SDRs) (1)
- speeds and feeds (1)
- standalone (1)
- storage (1)
- systems (1)
- tactical wide area networks (1)
- technical support (1)
- technology (1)
- third-party motherboards (1)
- troposcatter communication (1)
- unlicensed spectrum (1)
- volatile memory (1)
- vpx (1)
- zero trust network (1)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (3)
- February 2024 (1)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (3)
- May 2023 (7)
- April 2023 (5)
- March 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (6)
- October 2022 (7)
- September 2022 (8)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (13)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (11)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (4)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (8)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (6)
- July 2020 (9)
- June 2020 (11)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (9)
- January 2018 (27)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
Comments (2)